+7 (777) 001 44 99
Қазақша
Русский
English
Қазақша
Русский
English
ПОДЕЛИТЬСЯ
Two sets of talks on Wednesday aimed at easing tensions over Iran's nuclear programme are not expected to produce any major breakthrough ahead of next month's elections in the Islamic republic, AFP reports. In Vienna, the UN atomic agency, the IAEA, will press Iranian officials to grant access to sites, documents and scientists involved in Tehran's alleged efforts to develop atomic weapons. Separate but linked talks in Istanbul see EU foreign policy head Catherine Ashton meet Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili for the first time since fruitless six-party negotiations in Kazakhstan in April. The International Atomic Energy Agency says that there is "overall, credible" evidence that until 2003, and possibly since, Iranian scientists conducted research into developing the bomb. The agency conducts regular inspections of Iran's declared nuclear facilities and Tehran, which denies seeking or ever having sought atomic weapons, says it is not obliged to grant access to any other sites. Iran says the IAEA's findings are based on faulty intelligence from foreign spy agencies such as the US CIA and Israel's Mossad -- intelligence it complains it has not even been allowed to see. Nine rounds of talks since the publication of a major IAEA report in November 2011 have produced no breakthrough. Parallel diplomatic efforts meanwhile between Iran and six major powers -- the US, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany -- are focused more on Iran's current activities, most notably uranium enrichment. Enriched uranium is at the heart of the international community's concerns since it can be used not only for peaceful purposes such as power generation but also -- when highly purified -- in a nuclear bomb. The latest round with the "P5+1" in Almaty, Kazakhstan in early April ended with Ashton saying the two sides remained "far apart" despite the P5+1 having sweetened an earlier offer. The UN Security Council has passed multiple resolutions calling on Iran to suspend all uranium enrichment, imposing several rounds of sanctions on the Islamic republic. Additional US and EU sanctions last year began to cause major economic problems by targeting the Persian Gulf country's vital oil sector and financial system. Israel, the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear-armed state, meanwhile has refused to rule out military action on Iran -- as has US President Barack Obama. Efforts to resolve the long-running dispute are complicated by the fact that Iran goes to the polls on June 14 to choose a successor to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, with Jalili himself among the hopefuls. "It is clear that no progress is possible before the election," Mark Fitzpatrick, analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, told AFP. "Progress would require compromise on Iran's part, which would provide ammunition for political mudslinging and claims of sell-out," he said. Tensions among Iran's political factions following the heavy-handed crackdown of protestors after the last election in 2009 contributed to a breakdown in efforts at that time to resolve the nuclear impasse. Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Abbas Araqchi, saying the Iranians "hope to see progress" in both sets of talks, denied in Tehran on Tuesday that the election posed a barrier to progress. "If the P5+1 group prefer to wait (to resume the talks) after Iran's election, that will be their decision. But from our point of view, the talks can continue normally," Araqchi said. The next government, regardless of who is president, "will defend Iran's principal positions and the rights of the nation," Araqchi said.
Two sets of talks on Wednesday aimed at easing tensions over Iran's nuclear programme are not expected to produce any major breakthrough ahead of next month's elections in the Islamic republic, AFP reports.
In Vienna, the UN atomic agency, the IAEA, will press Iranian officials to grant access to sites, documents and scientists involved in Tehran's alleged efforts to develop atomic weapons.
Separate but linked talks in Istanbul see EU foreign policy head Catherine Ashton meet Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili for the first time since fruitless six-party negotiations in Kazakhstan in April.
The International Atomic Energy Agency says that there is "overall, credible" evidence that until 2003, and possibly since, Iranian scientists conducted research into developing the bomb.
The agency conducts regular inspections of Iran's declared nuclear facilities and Tehran, which denies seeking or ever having sought atomic weapons, says it is not obliged to grant access to any other sites.
Iran says the IAEA's findings are based on faulty intelligence from foreign spy agencies such as the US CIA and Israel's Mossad -- intelligence it complains it has not even been allowed to see.
Nine rounds of talks since the publication of a major IAEA report in November 2011 have produced no breakthrough.
Parallel diplomatic efforts meanwhile between Iran and six major powers -- the US, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany -- are focused more on Iran's current activities, most notably uranium enrichment.
Enriched uranium is at the heart of the international community's concerns since it can be used not only for peaceful purposes such as power generation but also -- when highly purified -- in a nuclear bomb.
The latest round with the "P5+1" in Almaty, Kazakhstan in early April ended with Ashton saying the two sides remained "far apart" despite the P5+1 having sweetened an earlier offer.
The UN Security Council has passed multiple resolutions calling on Iran to suspend all uranium enrichment, imposing several rounds of sanctions on the Islamic republic.
Additional US and EU sanctions last year began to cause major economic problems by targeting the Persian Gulf country's vital oil sector and financial system.
Israel, the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear-armed state, meanwhile has refused to rule out military action on Iran -- as has US President Barack Obama.
Efforts to resolve the long-running dispute are complicated by the fact that Iran goes to the polls on June 14 to choose a successor to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, with Jalili himself among the hopefuls.
"It is clear that no progress is possible before the election," Mark Fitzpatrick, analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, told AFP.
"Progress would require compromise on Iran's part, which would provide ammunition for political mudslinging and claims of sell-out," he said.
Tensions among Iran's political factions following the heavy-handed crackdown of protestors after the last election in 2009 contributed to a breakdown in efforts at that time to resolve the nuclear impasse.
Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Abbas Araqchi, saying the Iranians "hope to see progress" in both sets of talks, denied in Tehran on Tuesday that the election posed a barrier to progress.
"If the P5+1 group prefer to wait (to resume the talks) after Iran's election, that will be their decision. But from our point of view, the talks can continue normally," Araqchi said.
The next government, regardless of who is president, "will defend Iran's principal positions and the rights of the nation," Araqchi said.
