Tengrinews TV Радио Tengri FM Радио Жұлдыз FM Laws of Kazakhstan
KZ RU EN
Write us +7 (727) 388 8020 +7 (717) 254 2710
искать через Tengrinews.kz
искать через Google
искать через Yandex
USD / KZT - 326.70
EUR / KZT - 380.77
CNY / KZT - 48.41
RUB / KZT - 5.45

Key issues at Durban UN climate talks

22 november 2011, 14:52
0

Following are the main issues at the UN climate talks in Durban, South Africa, from November 28 to December 9:

KYOTO PROTOCOL

The only international treaty to set down legally-binding curbs on carbon emissions is hanging by a thread.

More and more advanced economies say they will not renew their pledges after the first round of commitments expires at the end of 2012 because the world's biggest polluters remain outside these constraints.

That leaves the European Union (EU) in Durban as the only bloc willing to renew its vows -- provided the top two emitters, China and the United States, endorse a "roadmap" to a comprehensive climate pact by 2015.

Without a second commitment period, Kyoto would still exist as a treaty but it would be operationally gutted. Its collapse would send a devastating signal about the climate process ahead of the 20th anniversary of the Rio Summit where the forum was born.

But some experts say the treaty's labyrinthine rulebook and 1990s-era distinctions between between rich and poor countries should be ditched. Kyoto could be cannibalised and its useful parts incorporated into a new approach, they argue.

CLIMATE FINANCE

At the 2009 Copenhagen Summit, developed nations committed to creating a Green Climate Fund that will disburse, by 2020, at least 100 billion dollars per year to help poorer nations fight and cope with climate change.

The Durban meeting will seek to resolve problems on the Fund's design.

©AFP
©AFP

Developing nations want more money for adapting to climate change rather than keeping emissions down, and favour the creation of a UN-controlled fund to distribute the money.

Rich nations, though, prioritise emissions mitigation, and prefer using existing channels such as the World Bank.

Another issue is whether to endow the Fund with a specific source of revenue, such as a tax on aviation and shipping fuels, a global financial transaction fee and auctioning of carbon emissions allowances.

International delegations gathered in Berlin for a conference to prepare for the upcoming U.N. climate conference in Durban. ©Reuters
International delegations gathered in Berlin for a conference to prepare for the upcoming U.N. climate conference in Durban. ©Reuters

Most of 30 billion dollars in Copenhagen's "fast-start financing" for 2010-2012 has been pledged and a good portion of it disbursed.

Still unclear is how climate financing will build up to the 100 billion-per-year-target, starting in 2013. The 2008 global financial crisis and the looming threat of further recession is making this task hard.

FORESTS

Forests are "sinks" that soak up nearly a third of carbon emissions each year. Loss of forests is also a powerful addition to the greenhouse-gas problem.

©RIA Novosti
©RIA Novosti

The UN-backed scheme known as REDD+ -- Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation 'Plus' -- allots credit to tropical countries in Latin America, Asia and Africa that slow rates of forest destruction.

It also provides a mechanism for rich countries to offset their own carbon-reduction commitments by investing in that process.

Environmental groups say a portion of the Green Climate Fund should be earmarked for REDD+, which will require 15 to 40 billion dollars to implement, according to different estimates.

An event called
An event called "Stop Talking Start Planting ". ©Reuters

They also call on the UN body to set a 2020 target for reversing the net loss of forest cover. Neither goal will be easily achieved.

EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE

A question since the Copenhagen Summit is how to make voluntary national cuts in greenhouse gas emissions measurable, reportable and verifiable -- "MRV", in UN climate lingo.

©Reuters
©Reuters

Progress has been stymied by a reluctance by developing countries to be subject to the same scrutiny as developed ones under the UNFCCC's two-tier system of accountability.

Rich countries say that emerging giants will account for the lion's share of emissions in the future, which means the "MRVs" have to be credible. The United States, in particular, is insisting on common standards in oversight.

Source: AFP


Нравится
Поделиться
Add comment
Most Read
Most Discussed
Today
Week
Month