Lawyers want Boston bombing trial delayed to Sept 2015 02 сентября 2014, 22:40
- Subscribe to the TengriNews news channel:
- Google News
- Яндекс Новости
- Email рассылка
- Found a bug?
- Select it and press Ctrl + Enter
Lawyers defending the prime suspect in the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings have requested that his trial, due to start in November, be delayed until at least September next year, AFP reports.
Twin bombs planted at the marathon finish line killed three people and injured 264 on April 15, 2013, in an attack allegedly carried out by Chechen brothers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev.
The US government accuses 21-year-old Dzhokhar, a naturalized US citizen, of 30 federal charges which could see him sentenced to death if convicted.
Police shot dead his older brother Tamerlan after the attacks.
In documents submitted to the court during the Labor Day holiday weekend, Tsarnaev's lawyers said that holding the trial just 16 months after the attacks provides insufficient time to prepare an adequate defense, and requested a delay until September 2015.
"It is critically important that any trial be fair, which means giving both sides, not just the government, enough time to uncover and present all relevant evidence," they wrote.
His lawyers said that the current trial start date of November 3 does not leave enough time to adequately test the government's case or to present Tsarnaev's own evidence.
"The sheer scope of the law enforcement investigation... and the massive amount of testimonial, physical, digital and expert evidence that it has generated, have overwhelmed the ability of defense counsel to evaluate and respond to the government's case in the time allotted," they said.
The defense team also renewed its request that the trial not take place in Boston, arguing that holding it in the northeastern city so severely impacted by the attacks would be prejudicial to the defendant.
Defense lawyers requested in June that Tsarnaev's trial be moved to Washington, DC.
Prosecutors last month, in their response to that defense motion, insisted it is fully possible to seat a jury untainted by more than a year of wall-to-wall coverage of the case.