+7 (777) 001 44 99
Қазақша
Русский
English
Қазақша
Русский
English
ПОДЕЛИТЬСЯ
The colours blue and green symbolise the rift between opposing political parties in Taiwan, an entrenched divide that polarises friends and families, with this weekend's historic China summit adding fuel to the fire, AFP reports.
The colours blue and green symbolise the rift between opposing political parties in Taiwan, an entrenched divide that polarises friends and families, with this weekend's historic China summit adding fuel to the fire, AFP reports.
As Taiwan's president Ma Ying-jeou prepares to meet his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in Singapore on Saturday, the visceral response from blues and greens has highlighted the seemingly irreconcilable split over Taiwan's identity and role in the world.
The summit could be a turning point for the island, a self-ruling democracy which split from China in 1949 following a civil war, and which Beijing views as a renegade province awaiting reunification -- by force if necessary.
The blue camp favours closer ties with China, with the staunchest "dark blues" supporting full unification.
The greens strongly reject any "one China" principle, viewing Taiwan as an entirely separate entity. "Dark greens" call for formal independence from China -- a move that would risk an armed response.
Ma's Beijing-friendly Kuomintang (KMT) is the main "blue" party, while the opposition Beijing-sceptic Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) represents the greens.
The blue, taken from the KMT banner of a white sun against a blue sky, is associated with the party's urban strongholds in the north, while green evokes the DPP's grassroot rural support, particularly in the island's south.
The announcement of Saturday's talks provoked strong responses from both sides -- from political leaders to academics and the general public -- with the blue camp saying it was long overdue and the greens accusing Ma of selling out Taiwan.
"Taiwan traditionally has been split between the KMT and DPP, or the unification and independence they each represent," says Wang Yeh-lih, a political science professor at National Taiwan University.
"The blue supporters will back the Ma-Xi meeting, and the greens will of course oppose it. Taiwan has never had a high degree of consensus on this."
While citizens have become used to the split, some fear the enduring impact across an island which is heading to presidential elections in January as Ma bows out.
"My family is open-minded, but the problem has affected relationships between some of my friends. They argue until they are red in the face, defending their political ideas or their favourite parties," says Jesmine Su, a 30-year-old office worker from the southern city of Tainan.
"The phenomenon is bad for Taiwan... it has led people not to look at issues in a rational manner, from individuals and families to different political parties," she said.
A third way?
Ma has overseen a dramatic rapprochement with China since he came to power in 2008, yielding a tourism boom, the opening of flight routes, and more than 20 trade agreements.
But there is scepticism from voters who believe that only big business has benefited from the pacts, while the Taiwanese economy remains in the doldrums and salaries are static.
There are also fears that closer ties will risk Taiwan's sovereignty and security as Beijing tries to impose control, concerns which have seen public support for the president and his party plummet.
But while Ma's leadership has stoked divisions, there are also those who seek a path beyond the green-blue polarisation, and independent candidates with a fresh approach have benefited at a local level.
"I'm part of the population that doesn't care about green or blue. I care about the present, the reality, who can really make Taiwan better," said Hu Chih-cheng, 48, a building manager in Taipei who is among those embracing the new credo.
With the economy flagging, livelihood issues have become central to voter sentiment, for some overriding their traditional leanings.
Some analysts say the line between the camps is far more nuanced and flexible than it might initially appear as pragmatism weighs on ideology.
"There are of course many people who are diehard greens or diehard blues, but a much larger majority of voters base their support on the performance and policies of the parties," says Jonathan Sullivan from the University of Nottingham's School of Contemporary Chinese Studies.
"If the blue-green cleavage was absolute, we wouldn't see the kind of fluidity and volatility in election results in Taiwan," he said.
"Remember that after 2008 the DPP was supposedly finished, while the KMT rose to ascendancy. Now the opposite is happening."
