A top African Union official who led an inquiry into atrocities in war-torn South Sudan warned Friday that ignoring its recommendations would help the guilty to evade justice, AFP reports.
A top African Union official who led an inquiry into atrocities in war-torn South Sudan warned Friday that ignoring its recommendations would help the guilty to evade justice, AFP reports.
Led by former Nigerian president Olusegun Obasanjo, the AU commission of inquiry spent six months last year investigating the tens of thousands slaughtered in the civil war between fighters loyal to South Sudan President Salva Kiir and his sacked deputy-turned-rebel leader Riek Machar.
But the African Union's Peace and Security Council said Friday they would "defer the consideration of the report... to a later date", without providing any explanation.
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch also said keeping the report under wraps would only benefit those trying to avoid possible war crimes trials.
Mandated to "investigate human rights violations and other abuses during the conflict by all parties", Obasanjo handed over its findings on Thursday to the AU's Peace and Security Council. Details of the report and its recommendations have not been released.
"The peace process and the mandate of the Commission of Inquiry are the two sides of the same coin," Obasanjo told reporters Friday.
"The cycle of impunity must be broken... we urgently hope that the recommendations of the report will be implemented."
Fighting broke out in South Sudan, the world's youngest nation, in December 2013 when Kiir accused Machar of attempting a coup. The fighting in the capital Juba set off a cycle of retaliatory massacres across the country, pushing it to the brink of famine.
Both sides have been implicated in ethnic massacres that at one point prompted UN officials to sound the alarm over a possible slide towards genocide, and there have been incidents of rapes, looting of aid agency supplies, child soldier recruitment and attacks on UN bases sheltering civilians.
Six ceasefire deals have all collapsed, with rivals due to meet again for the latest peace effort on Saturday alongside leaders of East Africa's regional bloc IGAD.
A petition from 21 key South Sudanese civil society organisations called for the report to be made public, saying it could play a "critical role in deterring further violations" as well as "ensuring accountability for crimes committed".
'A slap in the face'
Amnesty International spoke of a "slap in the face" for those who had risked giving evidence to the commission, and that the AU had "failed the thousands of South Sudanese victims who are waiting for truth and justice."
Human Rights Watch warned that suppressing a report "documenting wartime abuses... could hinder bringing those responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity to account."
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, speaking earlier Friday at the opening of the annual AU summit, called on Kiir and Machar to strike a deal to "end this man-made tragedy."
Obasanjo had said when he started his investigation that "Africa must not condone impunity of Africans treating Africans as if they are not human beings," and that he would "leave no stone unturned."
Earlier this month UN Assistant Secretary General Ivan Simonovic said that shelving the key report on South Sudan's year-long war would be a "very disturbing development" at a time when the UN Security Council is weighing sanctions.
Simonovic is due to visit South Sudan again next week to "seek updates on progress in investigations of human rights violations."
The United States told the Security Council in November that it was ready to present a draft resolution on imposing sanctions on leaders who are thwarting peace efforts in South Sudan, but there has been no movement since.